21 reviews
Cold War Noir
Assignment: Paris is another of those films with a faraway location that never got past the Columbia back lot. Still it's a decent enough Cold War noir thriller.
Dana Andrews is a hotshot reporter for the New York Herald Tribune assigned to its prestige international division in Paris which is headed by editor George Sanders. Andrews is covering the capture and trial of an American for espionage by the Hungarian hardline regime. Of course when he's sent to Budapest in pursuit of the story, Andrews becomes the story himself and Sanders works like a demon to get him free.
Sanders is aided and abetted by the lovely Marta Toren who gets in a bit of hot water herself in the effort. Audrey Totter, the fashion editor, provides moral support all around.
Hard to believe that in five years Toren would be gone, dying of leukemia at a young age. That was one extraordinarily beautiful woman, what a career she should have had.
Though Andrews is first billed, the film is really carried by Sanders in one of his few roles as a good guy. The man with the built in sneer carries the part off well.
The Cold War atmosphere was just right for these shadowy noir films of intrigue. Assignment: Paris is a good representation of the times.
Dana Andrews is a hotshot reporter for the New York Herald Tribune assigned to its prestige international division in Paris which is headed by editor George Sanders. Andrews is covering the capture and trial of an American for espionage by the Hungarian hardline regime. Of course when he's sent to Budapest in pursuit of the story, Andrews becomes the story himself and Sanders works like a demon to get him free.
Sanders is aided and abetted by the lovely Marta Toren who gets in a bit of hot water herself in the effort. Audrey Totter, the fashion editor, provides moral support all around.
Hard to believe that in five years Toren would be gone, dying of leukemia at a young age. That was one extraordinarily beautiful woman, what a career she should have had.
Though Andrews is first billed, the film is really carried by Sanders in one of his few roles as a good guy. The man with the built in sneer carries the part off well.
The Cold War atmosphere was just right for these shadowy noir films of intrigue. Assignment: Paris is a good representation of the times.
- bkoganbing
- Aug 7, 2007
- Permalink
Thrown together Cold War drama
Dana Andrews has "Assignment: Paris" in this 1952 Cold War drama that also stars George Sanders and Marta Toren. Andrews is Jimmy Race, an ambitious reporter in the Paris office of the New York Herald Tribune; his boss is George Sanders. Race is assigned the espionage trial of an American captured by the Hungarians. In Budapest, Race is captured, and it's up to Sanders to try to free him.
Sanders gets help from a woman, played by Marta Toren, whose background is not explained. Audrey Totter plays a fashion editor.
All the performances are good, but the revelation is Toren, whom I'd never seen before. She was remarkably beautiful and a fine actress. Unfortunately she died very young, which is a terrible tragedy. She never makes the list of most beautiful, and she should. I suppose not that many people are familiar with her.
Sanders carries the film in the workhorse role, and an unusual one for him as he's a good guy. The film is done in more of a documentary style with a dynamic conclusion, though some plot points are up in the air.
Definitely worth seeing for the stunning Toren.
Sanders gets help from a woman, played by Marta Toren, whose background is not explained. Audrey Totter plays a fashion editor.
All the performances are good, but the revelation is Toren, whom I'd never seen before. She was remarkably beautiful and a fine actress. Unfortunately she died very young, which is a terrible tragedy. She never makes the list of most beautiful, and she should. I suppose not that many people are familiar with her.
Sanders carries the film in the workhorse role, and an unusual one for him as he's a good guy. The film is done in more of a documentary style with a dynamic conclusion, though some plot points are up in the air.
Definitely worth seeing for the stunning Toren.
post WW II cold war Thrilla
Assignment Paris is directed by Oscar-awarded Robert Parrish, who had worked with Charlie Chaplin, Hal Roach, and John Ford in the 1920s and 1930s. Looking at his resume, he certainly worked his way up the ladder the old fashioned way. George Sanders plays Nicholas Strang, the wise editor of the paper, for which Jimmy Race (Dana Andrews) works as a digging, scheming reporter. Viewers will recognize Sanders from All About Eve, again playing the older, wiser, mentor. A lot of time is spent with the viewer (but not the characters in the film) watching and hearing what is going on inside the foreign embassies and administration offices, so it's very much a cold war us- against- them story, with Race trying to get to the truth. Caught up in all this is fellow reporter Marta Toren as Jeanne Moray, and no-one is really sure what her story is.... We are led to think she is more involved than we know, but that part of the story seems to have been dropped, or deleted. Also keep an eye out for Leon Askin, who would play General Bulkhalter in Hogan's Heroes ten years later. Quite entertaining, but it almost feels like an episode of Dragnet -- more documentary than story, which could have been the director's intent. Thrilling, if not surprising, conclusion to the movie.
An odd curio from the Cold War
- planktonrules
- Aug 8, 2007
- Permalink
Red Scare film with Dana Andrews
Assignment - Paris
Dana Andrews is one-man newspaper "Race" who is transferred to the Paris office where he works for veteran "Nick" (George Sanders) whilst trying to prize his girlfriend "Jeanne" (Märta Torén) away from him. She resists but he persists and she is soon beginning to fall for his charms. Luckily for "Nick" though, a situation develops when an American citizen is sentenced to twenty years in an Hungarian prison for espionage. "Race" is sent to follow up the story and soon finds himself arrested and embroiled in a plot that involves the highest level of the Government and some secret meetings that might well annoy the Soviets. "Nick" and "Jeanne" now have to find a way of obtaining freedom for the writer and getting to the bottom of this conspiracy. This film moves along well with some engaging characterisations from Andrews, Sanders and Torén. It mixes romance and political intrigue with less emphasis on the first aspect and there's some torture and a bit of sarcasm before a denouement that smacked very much of a John Le Carré novel. I enjoyed this.
- CinemaSerf
- Dec 2, 2023
- Permalink
Assignment:Parrish
Half of the movie takes place in Paris ,like the title reads;the other half ,which was obviously NOT filmed on location takes place in Hungaria Based on a true story ,we are told ,but the script is really one-sided .A cold war thriller,it's one of the most anti-commies movie I know,this side of "the red Danube" (1949)Americans are loyal,nice,chivalrous ,full of abnegation whereas -with the exception of Gabor- the commies are sinister-looking,cruel ;to think that they would not think twice before killing an innocent child!and they ill-treat a patient in a hospital!and what they do with the tape is not fair play!and they torture you,physically or mentally!And their long fingers are everywhere ,even in our sweet Paris.However,in 1952,if my memory serves me well,some Americans were having a bad time in their own country too.
Dana Andrews does not find here one of his best parts but his talent partly saves the movie and the supporting cast follows suit.I particularly like the coded messages in the conversations or in the phone calls."The little match girl" is a good idea.
Dana Andrews does not find here one of his best parts but his talent partly saves the movie and the supporting cast follows suit.I particularly like the coded messages in the conversations or in the phone calls."The little match girl" is a good idea.
- dbdumonteil
- Jul 6, 2010
- Permalink
Thick "Red-Scare" Movie with Foreign Intrigue...Complex Story - Journalists Investigate "Commies"
Based on a "True Story"...the 1952 book "Trial by Terror" by Paul and Pauline Gallico.
The Movie has the Feeling of Urgency to Coincide with the "Red Scare" Reality Taking Place Across the States,
with Senate Hearings and Daily Reports of the "Communists", the Domino Effect, the Korean War, as it Felt to Many that the "Cold-War" is a Burgeoning Devastating Reality with an Uncertain Future.
The Film had Phil Karlson Directing but was Fired Half-Way Through and Replaced by Robert Parrish. Both Familiar to Film-Noir Fans and Their Significant Contribution.
5 Time Oscar Nominee Burnett Guffey, who Won for "Bonnie and Clyde" (1967) is Behind the Camera.
The Cast is a Familiar One...Dana Andrews, George Sanders, Audrey Totter, and the Short-Lived European Beauty, Marta Toren.
It's a Spy vs Newspaper Spy Story...
Paris is the Foreign Headquarters for the "New York Herald Tribune" and becomes as Involved as the "Secret Service",
with Behind the Iron Curtain Espionage and Terrorism, and the "Reds" are Portrayed with "Stereotypical Caricatures"...
Sneering, Villains, who Show No Humanity even to Their Comrades.
They Torture Brutally with Glee, and even Threaten Children Directly, and Perhaps even Lobotomize, just because They Can.
There are Layers Upon Layers of Intrigue, Kidnapping, Totalitarianism, and More. All at an Accelerated Rate...Paying Attention is a Must.
It's so Fast and Thick that Keeping Track is a Challenge because Corners are Cut and Threads Dangle when it's All Said and Done.
A Major Strength is its Alignment with Current Events and Mirrors the Headlines of the Day with Gusto, and a Side-Dish of Romance that, Frankly, is a Bore and a Non-Necessity Except for Concerns about Box-Office Receipts.
A Cold-War Artifact of Hollywood that would Become a Sub-Genre..."The Red Scare" Movies
Worth a Watch.
The Movie has the Feeling of Urgency to Coincide with the "Red Scare" Reality Taking Place Across the States,
with Senate Hearings and Daily Reports of the "Communists", the Domino Effect, the Korean War, as it Felt to Many that the "Cold-War" is a Burgeoning Devastating Reality with an Uncertain Future.
The Film had Phil Karlson Directing but was Fired Half-Way Through and Replaced by Robert Parrish. Both Familiar to Film-Noir Fans and Their Significant Contribution.
5 Time Oscar Nominee Burnett Guffey, who Won for "Bonnie and Clyde" (1967) is Behind the Camera.
The Cast is a Familiar One...Dana Andrews, George Sanders, Audrey Totter, and the Short-Lived European Beauty, Marta Toren.
It's a Spy vs Newspaper Spy Story...
Paris is the Foreign Headquarters for the "New York Herald Tribune" and becomes as Involved as the "Secret Service",
with Behind the Iron Curtain Espionage and Terrorism, and the "Reds" are Portrayed with "Stereotypical Caricatures"...
Sneering, Villains, who Show No Humanity even to Their Comrades.
They Torture Brutally with Glee, and even Threaten Children Directly, and Perhaps even Lobotomize, just because They Can.
There are Layers Upon Layers of Intrigue, Kidnapping, Totalitarianism, and More. All at an Accelerated Rate...Paying Attention is a Must.
It's so Fast and Thick that Keeping Track is a Challenge because Corners are Cut and Threads Dangle when it's All Said and Done.
A Major Strength is its Alignment with Current Events and Mirrors the Headlines of the Day with Gusto, and a Side-Dish of Romance that, Frankly, is a Bore and a Non-Necessity Except for Concerns about Box-Office Receipts.
A Cold-War Artifact of Hollywood that would Become a Sub-Genre..."The Red Scare" Movies
Worth a Watch.
- LeonLouisRicci
- Aug 15, 2023
- Permalink
the Iron Curtain
An American named Robert Anderson has been arrested by Hungary for spying. Jimmy Race (Dana Andrews) is a brash reporter from the New York Herald-Tribune in Paris. He and top reporter Jeanne Moray (Märta Torén) are trying to interview the Hungary ambassador. She has a story that the Hungary leadership is trying rapprochement with Yugoslavia's Tito despite Soviet objection. The Hungarian authority is keeping a close eye on her.
The story is a little slow at times. The movie seems more interested in getting the Cold War right. The Iron Curtain has descended and this is an almost straight forward telling. It's a story out of the headlines. It doesn't automatically make it a good story. Jimmy Race is overly brash to the point of arrogance. He should be smarter than that. The girl doesn't seem like the reporter type. I do like the rip from the headlines aspect but it could be done with more tension.
The story is a little slow at times. The movie seems more interested in getting the Cold War right. The Iron Curtain has descended and this is an almost straight forward telling. It's a story out of the headlines. It doesn't automatically make it a good story. Jimmy Race is overly brash to the point of arrogance. He should be smarter than that. The girl doesn't seem like the reporter type. I do like the rip from the headlines aspect but it could be done with more tension.
- SnoopyStyle
- Jul 12, 2022
- Permalink
Middling Spy Drama With Some Location Shooting
Cocky young reporter DANA ANDREWS gets at the truth of some political funny business in Cold War Hungary. Will this help him in his budding romance with the pretty young émigré he took from improbable good guy GEORGE SANDERS during his ASSIGNMENT Paris?
This is a rather typical Columbia production -- decent actors thrown into a fairly silly plot where the implausibilities keep piling up. The good to this movie is the location shooting (they really are in Paris in the exteriors -- love the scene where it's spitting snowflakes) and George Sanders, gamely taking on the sort of role given to Ralph Bellamy. The bad is a somewhat dumb cold war plot, that assumes that a reporter sent to a cold war country is likely going to be arrested, put on trial, and brainwashed (as opposed to merely deported after a careful search). Also, if a reporter really acted like Dana Andrews in his professional or romantic life, he would have his lights punched out by his victims, and be arrested for stalking.
In other words -- not bad, and if you like George Sanders, it might be interesting to see him tackle a non-sneering part. Be warned, though, that Dana Andrews is seriously annoying in this one.
This is a rather typical Columbia production -- decent actors thrown into a fairly silly plot where the implausibilities keep piling up. The good to this movie is the location shooting (they really are in Paris in the exteriors -- love the scene where it's spitting snowflakes) and George Sanders, gamely taking on the sort of role given to Ralph Bellamy. The bad is a somewhat dumb cold war plot, that assumes that a reporter sent to a cold war country is likely going to be arrested, put on trial, and brainwashed (as opposed to merely deported after a careful search). Also, if a reporter really acted like Dana Andrews in his professional or romantic life, he would have his lights punched out by his victims, and be arrested for stalking.
In other words -- not bad, and if you like George Sanders, it might be interesting to see him tackle a non-sneering part. Be warned, though, that Dana Andrews is seriously annoying in this one.
- alonzoiii-1
- Sep 3, 2007
- Permalink
Cold War look at Soviet press control and a great newspaper
The screenplay of "Assignment in Paris" is choppy in places, and the scenes seem hurried at times. But, the plot for this Columbia film is a very good one. And, it's unusual among movies made during and about the Cold War. Unusual, because it is about the press and its coverage of Iron Curtain nations in that time. This film shows how communist countries tried to control the press. And, how they regularly lied to the world about their affairs, their oppression of the people, and their denial of human rights. Many records, books and films of Soviet rule have become available since the fall of the Iron Curtin in 1990.
The acting in this film is good all around. Dana Andrews is Jimmy Race, a former American paratrooper from World War II. Mara Torén is Jeanne Moray who was a member of the French underground in the war. Both are reporters and working for the Trib in the present time. George Sanders is Nicholas Strang, editor chief of the European edition of the paper. All the supporting cast are good. The street scenes of Budapest and Paris are good and offer a glaring contrast. The IMDb listing has shooting locations in those capitols. The latter has the usual scene of cars driving by the Eifel Tower. I particularly noted the Budapest street scene with nary a soul in sight and just one vehicle on the street. When I visited East Berlin in 1964, it was like that – very few people on the streets. Friends who visited or were from other Iron Curtain countries told me it was the same in those places.
The setting for this film moves between Paris and Budapest. While the time, the Cold War and the places were very real, the particular plot is fictitious. Some of the characters are real (Josip Tito) and others are not (Prime Minister Ordy). Tito ruled Yugoslavia from 1944 to 1980. A secret event that is at the heart of this story involves three countries – Hungary, Yugoslavia and Russia. It's interesting to note that Hungary was a member of the Axis nations in World War II, but Yugoslavia was an Allied nation.
This film premiered in the U.S. on Sept. 4, 1952, and across Western Europe in 1953. But just four years after its release, the real Hungarian Revolution of 1956 took place. The uprising lasted from Oct. 23 to Nov. 10, 1956; and by the end of October, the communist government had collapsed and local popular groups were taking office. Then the Soviet Union invaded with tanks and armed forces on Nov. 4 to quash the rebellion. At the end, more than 2,500 Hungarians and 700 Soviet troops were killed. More than 200,000 Hungarian refugees fled the country. By Jan. 1957, a new Soviet-run government was installed. Mention of the event was suppressed for more than 30 years. Only after the fall of the Iron Curtain and end of the Cold War in 1991, could Hungarians begin to talk about the revolt. After the Soviet invasion, many people fled communist parties in nations around the globe.
I served in the U.S. Army in Germany during the Cold War and before Vietnam. I met and befriended an American soldier who had been in the Hungarian revolt. Laszlo Simon had been a student in November 1956, and he told me he was throwing Molotov cocktails on Russian tanks in Budapest. He was among those who fled the country. He got to an American embassy in Western Europe and joined the U.S. Army. Laszlo became a U.S. citizen. He was transferred to the States and I lost track of him after that.
One other thing of note in this film is the American newspaper in the story. The New York Herald Tribune published its Paris or European edition for some four decades in the mid-20th century. It was the most prominent English newspaper published abroad. Americans, Britons, Canadians and others who spoke English relied on the Herald Tribune for news. The "Trib" won numerous Pulitzer Prizes and was considered the best written and best reported English paper of its day. And, it was the best read paper in America as well as in Continental Europe and Asia.
"Assignment Paris" makes a fine addition to any film collection. The film is peppered with witty lines here and there. Sandy (played by Audrey Totter), says to a bartender (played by Jay Adler, uncredited), "Please, Henry. A good bartender lets a customer cry in his own beer." Ambassador Borvitch (played by Donald Randolph) says, "Geography can be a state of mind." The prime minister in his broadcast gives the usual Soviet denunciation of "the war-mongering capitalistic nations."
The acting in this film is good all around. Dana Andrews is Jimmy Race, a former American paratrooper from World War II. Mara Torén is Jeanne Moray who was a member of the French underground in the war. Both are reporters and working for the Trib in the present time. George Sanders is Nicholas Strang, editor chief of the European edition of the paper. All the supporting cast are good. The street scenes of Budapest and Paris are good and offer a glaring contrast. The IMDb listing has shooting locations in those capitols. The latter has the usual scene of cars driving by the Eifel Tower. I particularly noted the Budapest street scene with nary a soul in sight and just one vehicle on the street. When I visited East Berlin in 1964, it was like that – very few people on the streets. Friends who visited or were from other Iron Curtain countries told me it was the same in those places.
The setting for this film moves between Paris and Budapest. While the time, the Cold War and the places were very real, the particular plot is fictitious. Some of the characters are real (Josip Tito) and others are not (Prime Minister Ordy). Tito ruled Yugoslavia from 1944 to 1980. A secret event that is at the heart of this story involves three countries – Hungary, Yugoslavia and Russia. It's interesting to note that Hungary was a member of the Axis nations in World War II, but Yugoslavia was an Allied nation.
This film premiered in the U.S. on Sept. 4, 1952, and across Western Europe in 1953. But just four years after its release, the real Hungarian Revolution of 1956 took place. The uprising lasted from Oct. 23 to Nov. 10, 1956; and by the end of October, the communist government had collapsed and local popular groups were taking office. Then the Soviet Union invaded with tanks and armed forces on Nov. 4 to quash the rebellion. At the end, more than 2,500 Hungarians and 700 Soviet troops were killed. More than 200,000 Hungarian refugees fled the country. By Jan. 1957, a new Soviet-run government was installed. Mention of the event was suppressed for more than 30 years. Only after the fall of the Iron Curtain and end of the Cold War in 1991, could Hungarians begin to talk about the revolt. After the Soviet invasion, many people fled communist parties in nations around the globe.
I served in the U.S. Army in Germany during the Cold War and before Vietnam. I met and befriended an American soldier who had been in the Hungarian revolt. Laszlo Simon had been a student in November 1956, and he told me he was throwing Molotov cocktails on Russian tanks in Budapest. He was among those who fled the country. He got to an American embassy in Western Europe and joined the U.S. Army. Laszlo became a U.S. citizen. He was transferred to the States and I lost track of him after that.
One other thing of note in this film is the American newspaper in the story. The New York Herald Tribune published its Paris or European edition for some four decades in the mid-20th century. It was the most prominent English newspaper published abroad. Americans, Britons, Canadians and others who spoke English relied on the Herald Tribune for news. The "Trib" won numerous Pulitzer Prizes and was considered the best written and best reported English paper of its day. And, it was the best read paper in America as well as in Continental Europe and Asia.
"Assignment Paris" makes a fine addition to any film collection. The film is peppered with witty lines here and there. Sandy (played by Audrey Totter), says to a bartender (played by Jay Adler, uncredited), "Please, Henry. A good bartender lets a customer cry in his own beer." Ambassador Borvitch (played by Donald Randolph) says, "Geography can be a state of mind." The prime minister in his broadcast gives the usual Soviet denunciation of "the war-mongering capitalistic nations."
Hungarian Goulash
This movie assumes we viewers have a lot of background knowledge. I guess this is a "cold war drama". It seemed, to me, like a James Bond film. Anyway, it's about reporters in Hungry being threatened by Communists. Dana Andrews is taken by the Communists, and George Sanders has to get him back.
I found myself watching lead actress Märta Torén's performance above all. The photography, direction, and performances are interesting - Ms. Torén's performance is my favorite.
My biggest criticism it that I couldn't figure out what the Communists ultimately do to Mr. Andrews. Did he have a lobotomy or something? I think the filmmakers owe it to the audience to explain; and, with more than just an offhand speculation that he'll be "okay". We're supposed to assume Mr. Andrews is going to be "okay" and character Gabor will be safe with the Communists?
I don't understand.
***** Assignment: Paris (1952) Robert Parris ~ Dana Andrews, Märta Torén, George Sanders
I found myself watching lead actress Märta Torén's performance above all. The photography, direction, and performances are interesting - Ms. Torén's performance is my favorite.
My biggest criticism it that I couldn't figure out what the Communists ultimately do to Mr. Andrews. Did he have a lobotomy or something? I think the filmmakers owe it to the audience to explain; and, with more than just an offhand speculation that he'll be "okay". We're supposed to assume Mr. Andrews is going to be "okay" and character Gabor will be safe with the Communists?
I don't understand.
***** Assignment: Paris (1952) Robert Parris ~ Dana Andrews, Märta Torén, George Sanders
- wes-connors
- Aug 7, 2007
- Permalink
Assignment:Paris Not One of Dana's Best **
Dark problems with goings-on behind the iron curtain
A cold war insight that is fairly realistic and gives a very clear picture of the state of Europe, especially Hungary, during the last years of Stalin. It is especially relevant today as Putin tries to exonerate him and repeat his methods of stretching far outside Russia to persecute so called enemies that could be considered a threat to the infallibility of Russian dictatorship. Dana Andrews is reliable as usual, seconded here by the lovely Marta Toren, who played in films together with almost all the major stars of Hollywood before she died suddenly at only 30 as the successor to Ingrid Bergman, but Marta Toren also married and filmed in Italy. George Sanders is the sober diplomat who handles the intricate situation with due dignity, while the most realistic scenes are the most revolting, those of the Hungarian brainwash procedure under Stalin.
It's not one of Dana Andrews' best pictures, but no one could have made the part he plays better - he had been in it before, like in "The Iron Curtain" 1948.
It's not one of Dana Andrews' best pictures, but no one could have made the part he plays better - he had been in it before, like in "The Iron Curtain" 1948.
Result -Boredom.
- mark.waltz
- Apr 8, 2020
- Permalink
Half of the Film is Good
This film is exactly what they taught us in film school about what NOT to do with a plot, The first day of class we learned not to leave a pot of boiling water on a stove when you leave a room. The audience will always wonder what happened to the pot. This plot leaves TWO boiling pots of water on the stove when the director leaves the room. One is the main character, and the other a sympathetic character. Dana Andrews plays his usual smug and fast-talking hustler role, and then becomes one of the boiling pots. Some B actress from Europe plays his romantic interest, but she is not even as interesting as Ms Totter, who plays a minor role in the film. I have always loved George Saunders. I love everything he did. He tries hard to save this turkey, but he cant. Dumb newpaperman films are passe now; nobody reads newspapers. There are a lot of sharp newspaper films, but this is not one of them.
- arthur_tafero
- Aug 16, 2018
- Permalink
A well executed film
I viewed a few user's comments regarding this well cast ww2 film. Of my generation most of these lead performers are very well known in their own filmographies. Marta (for me ) I was not familiar with her prior to this viewing. Her performance was very well delivered in this spy film.
Assignment: Paris of 1952 may be listed as an American propaganda film, but I view this film much more than that. Perhaps it is because of my generation we lived through many of those years and decades of fear and the Cold War. We have different lenses to see through. Those who had spys, which America did and maybe still do, is to protect freedom. They had to live by any emotion or feelings in order to do their dangerous work. The acting approach to their character did well by the director's lead. The photography with shadows and lighting was done well for backlot location of the 50's and budget. The script was written with very little melodrama, but enough to care about each character given us. If one likes this genre I think you will enjoy seeing this film. I have seen it twice.
Assignment: Paris of 1952 may be listed as an American propaganda film, but I view this film much more than that. Perhaps it is because of my generation we lived through many of those years and decades of fear and the Cold War. We have different lenses to see through. Those who had spys, which America did and maybe still do, is to protect freedom. They had to live by any emotion or feelings in order to do their dangerous work. The acting approach to their character did well by the director's lead. The photography with shadows and lighting was done well for backlot location of the 50's and budget. The script was written with very little melodrama, but enough to care about each character given us. If one likes this genre I think you will enjoy seeing this film. I have seen it twice.
- camille-05424
- Sep 10, 2024
- Permalink
Uncle Joe won't like this one bit!
What a complete Failure!
- ExiledInCali
- Aug 9, 2019
- Permalink
Sauce for the goose.
One reviewer here points to the cold war actions of communist countries telling lies through the press.... As if America in the 50s and 60s never told lies ... ! Meanwhile now you have a Republican Party using the Communist playbook in their political campaigning suggesting VPs have been turned by Chinese surveillance... while the Democrats try to tell the electorate and the rest of the world that they care about the people and plan to curtail the power of corporations.... But this film is still pretty good. As long as you accept that the conceit that the US journalists ar interested in the truth!
- pieter-52462
- Aug 23, 2024
- Permalink
Investigating "voluntary" confessions
- jarrodmcdonald-1
- Aug 9, 2024
- Permalink