Review: Hotel Sorrento (1995)

hotelsorrento.jpg

Hotel Sorrento is a reflective and thoughtful rumination on Australian culture and identity. Fabulous local filmmaker Richard Franklin - one of our finest screen scaremongers - went way, way against type adapting Hannie Rayson’s well-loved play about a family forced to confront their demons and inhibitions after one of its members writes a “fictional” book about their lives.

One of the film’s many fleeting reflections is an exploration of the word “melancholy” - a word that perfectly suits Hotel Sorrento’s tone and pace.

Horror and thriller artists often understand precisely how to solicit specific emotive responses from audiences - Hitchcock’s famous allegory of cinema as a set of strings for a puppeteer summarizes exactly this notion - and Franklin does a fine job molding the film’s mood into something pensive but probing and expressive, matching an unobtrusive visual structure to the film’s vociferous theatrical rambles.

The (mostly female) cast are uniformly strong, and you never for a moment doubt the significance of the memories and grievances that rub over these character’s lives, causing friction and conflict between them.

Neither the film nor the play offer conclusive, rosy futures for their characters, but rather hints towards the redeeming powers of reconciliation.

Review by Luke Buckmaster
Cast: Caroline Goodall, Caroline Gillmer, Tara Morice, Joan Plowright, Ray Barrett, Nicholas Bell, Ben Thomas
Director: Richard Franklin
Screenplay: Richard Franklin and Peter Fitzpatrick, based on the play by Hannie Rayson
Bookmark and Share:

4 Comment(s)

  1. a very, boring movie….but still, deep and meaningful. i get a true feeling of melancholy

    (no pun on words itented)

    jessica | Mar 28, 2008 | Reply

  2. Fabulous. A real delving into Australia’s unique culture

    Gerda | Apr 13, 2008 | Reply

  3. i don’t feel the film does the play justice. i think the use of an Englishwoman as an Australian character is a cheap grab for international credability and completely takes away the meaning of the character in the play.

    charlotte | May 20, 2008 | Reply

  4. The movie isn’t that boring, it makes more sense when you read the play before watching it. I prefer the book rather than the film adaptation of it.

    aurore | Feb 26, 2009 | Reply

Post a Comment