19 reviews
MOVIE, MOVIE is a forgotten gem from the late 70's which is an affectionate spoof of a 1930's double feature (there's even a preview of coming attractions)that is divided into two separate films that run about 50 minutes a piece. The first film, "Dynamite Hands" is a black and white "Golden Boy"-type spoof with Harry Hamlin as a young boxer rising to the top with George C. Scott as his manager, Red Buttons as his trainer, Kathleen Beller as his hometown girlfriend and Ann Reinking as a nightclub singer named Troubles Moran. The second film is called "Baxter's Beauties of 1933" and is a colorful spoof of films like 42nd STREET with George C. Scott featured again as the egomaniacal director, Barry Bostwick as the idealistic young songwriter, Rebecca York (who years later would practically steal the Broadway show VICTOR/VICTORIA from Julie Andrews) as the young Ruby Keeler type and Trish VanDevere as the bitchy diva who York eventually replaces. True movie buffs and fans of these kinds of movies will be in cinema heaven here...a loving tribute to a bygone era that works thanks to spirited direction by Stanley Donen and an energetic cast.
A quick glance at the user comments will tell you that this film is worth seeing. I'm neither a musical fanatic nor a boxing enthusiast, but the numbers, performances and nuances were entrancing.
Somehow, Donen found the perfect blend for the self-reflexive genre picture, a combination that is exceedingly difficult for modern filmmakers to get a handle on. The viewer is watching a spoof yet all of the elements are still real. We feel for the pitifully archetypal characters because it seems that they realize their fate as symbols. George C. Scott's glances of reaction, just askew of breaking the third wall, depict someone who is aware of his limited fate, but still experiences with all of his emotions every situation as if he doesn't know it's coming. In this way, the actors, as in the Brechtian mode of theater, are somewhat like audience members themselves. They know the story and the ending, but they can't help suspending their disbelief, just for fun.
The musical numbers work in the same way. They are spoofs, fulfilling specific purposes and making all the proper illusions, yet are thoroughly enjoyable as musical numbers.
"Movie Movie" isn't necessarily a great movie, but it gives the illusion of greatness in its sincerity. In a medium where the audience often feels that they are the butt of a joke only the director knows the setup to, "Movie Movie" puts across the feeling that the director genuinely enjoys movies and expects everyone involved to derive the same pleasure from them.
Somehow, Donen found the perfect blend for the self-reflexive genre picture, a combination that is exceedingly difficult for modern filmmakers to get a handle on. The viewer is watching a spoof yet all of the elements are still real. We feel for the pitifully archetypal characters because it seems that they realize their fate as symbols. George C. Scott's glances of reaction, just askew of breaking the third wall, depict someone who is aware of his limited fate, but still experiences with all of his emotions every situation as if he doesn't know it's coming. In this way, the actors, as in the Brechtian mode of theater, are somewhat like audience members themselves. They know the story and the ending, but they can't help suspending their disbelief, just for fun.
The musical numbers work in the same way. They are spoofs, fulfilling specific purposes and making all the proper illusions, yet are thoroughly enjoyable as musical numbers.
"Movie Movie" isn't necessarily a great movie, but it gives the illusion of greatness in its sincerity. In a medium where the audience often feels that they are the butt of a joke only the director knows the setup to, "Movie Movie" puts across the feeling that the director genuinely enjoys movies and expects everyone involved to derive the same pleasure from them.
Fun parody of 30s movies showing two "movies" (they're actually only 50 minutes each) done by Warren Bros. (ha ha)
The first is "Dynamite Hands" with Harry Hamlin (so young and full of life) playing a boxer to save money to...well, the plot is familar...VERY familar. Every single boxing movie cliche is hit head on with sledgehammer subtlety and the dialogue is way over the top. It's not half as clever as it thinks it is but it still works. It's quick and so energetic it's impossible to dislike. Also Hamlin is obviously enjoying himself. George C. Scott (who's in both) is in it briefly and Red Buttons (also in both) lends strong support. It was in black and white up the theatres in 1978, but it's in color on cable. Why?
"Baxter's Beauties of 1933" is a parody of those big, splashy colorful musicals. The plot is basically a combination of every cliche from musicals back then. Barry Bostwick is in it and he's just "swell" as a Dick Powell type and Rebecca York is just great as a Ruby Keeler type. The music and lyrics are just OK but this is lots of fun--beautiful sets, great singing and dancing, impressive production numbers and full of fun.
As said before, George C. Scott is in both but is (surprisingly) bad--he looks bored and unsure of his lines. Buttons is great in both but Trish Van Devere is just terrible. She's very good-looking but a horrible actress.
No great film but worth catching--a must for movie buffs.
The first is "Dynamite Hands" with Harry Hamlin (so young and full of life) playing a boxer to save money to...well, the plot is familar...VERY familar. Every single boxing movie cliche is hit head on with sledgehammer subtlety and the dialogue is way over the top. It's not half as clever as it thinks it is but it still works. It's quick and so energetic it's impossible to dislike. Also Hamlin is obviously enjoying himself. George C. Scott (who's in both) is in it briefly and Red Buttons (also in both) lends strong support. It was in black and white up the theatres in 1978, but it's in color on cable. Why?
"Baxter's Beauties of 1933" is a parody of those big, splashy colorful musicals. The plot is basically a combination of every cliche from musicals back then. Barry Bostwick is in it and he's just "swell" as a Dick Powell type and Rebecca York is just great as a Ruby Keeler type. The music and lyrics are just OK but this is lots of fun--beautiful sets, great singing and dancing, impressive production numbers and full of fun.
As said before, George C. Scott is in both but is (surprisingly) bad--he looks bored and unsure of his lines. Buttons is great in both but Trish Van Devere is just terrible. She's very good-looking but a horrible actress.
No great film but worth catching--a must for movie buffs.
For anyone who has grown up loving Hollywood musicals, the second half of this film is an absolute joy. Stanley Donen, who has arguably directed the greatest of these, had a chance to create an homage to them which includes every silly musical plot and song and dance device he could think of. Barry Bostwick's first number will knock your socks off and the finale (including dancers on bikes!) will put a grin on your face from start to finish. Watch for Stanley Donen's cameo as a cab driver.
- kinolieber
- May 18, 2001
- Permalink
A film I've hunted down from my youth, this is Stanley Donen's loving tribute to the early Hollywood Golden age, personified in two (and a bit, counting the trailer for the "Hell's Angels" spoof aviation film in the intermission) spliced novellas rolled into one. Directed with finesse, played with brio by all the cast doubling up roles in both features, it's a fine entertainment all round.
I'm a sucker for boxing movies of the era and if anything slightly favour the B & W first feature "Dynamite Hands" over the "Baxter's Beauties" main attraction. The former benefits too from more gags, although the latter holds its end up with some typically stylish musical numbers at the finale. Both stories pay due homage to all the acknowledged clichés in both genres, and benefit from Donen's use of period devices like the old fashioned "curtains up" dissolves between scenes.
The cast all look like they're enjoying themselves which certainly helps matters. Biggest star present, George C Scott, somehow seems a little miscast in each of his roles, but gets by on style and enthusiasm, while Red Buttons and Art Carney are able in support. Harry Hamlin is effective as the boxer with a jaw of gold, (about the only mixed metaphor not employed in the feature!) forsaking the ring for the legal profession in "Dynamite Hands" and it was nice to see Barry Bostwick, whom I recently watched play another nerdy character in "Rocky Horror Picture Show", get a prominent run out as a Dick Powell type in "Baxter's Beauties". Meanwhile Trish Van Devere is suitably peppy as the understudy-makes-good starlet in the Zeigfeld spoof.
The set dressings for both films are first rate as you'd expect, the dialogue snappy if not quite laugh-a-minute, while the songs from the musical in "Baxter's Beauties", while well short of Porter or Gershwin standards, are pleasant and humorous enough.
I really enjoyed this double tonic and wish the same team could have contrived a double feature follow up perhaps incorporating spoofs of say, a southern melodrama and a hard-boiled private eye thriller...
I'm a sucker for boxing movies of the era and if anything slightly favour the B & W first feature "Dynamite Hands" over the "Baxter's Beauties" main attraction. The former benefits too from more gags, although the latter holds its end up with some typically stylish musical numbers at the finale. Both stories pay due homage to all the acknowledged clichés in both genres, and benefit from Donen's use of period devices like the old fashioned "curtains up" dissolves between scenes.
The cast all look like they're enjoying themselves which certainly helps matters. Biggest star present, George C Scott, somehow seems a little miscast in each of his roles, but gets by on style and enthusiasm, while Red Buttons and Art Carney are able in support. Harry Hamlin is effective as the boxer with a jaw of gold, (about the only mixed metaphor not employed in the feature!) forsaking the ring for the legal profession in "Dynamite Hands" and it was nice to see Barry Bostwick, whom I recently watched play another nerdy character in "Rocky Horror Picture Show", get a prominent run out as a Dick Powell type in "Baxter's Beauties". Meanwhile Trish Van Devere is suitably peppy as the understudy-makes-good starlet in the Zeigfeld spoof.
The set dressings for both films are first rate as you'd expect, the dialogue snappy if not quite laugh-a-minute, while the songs from the musical in "Baxter's Beauties", while well short of Porter or Gershwin standards, are pleasant and humorous enough.
I really enjoyed this double tonic and wish the same team could have contrived a double feature follow up perhaps incorporating spoofs of say, a southern melodrama and a hard-boiled private eye thriller...
I saw this movie when it first came out and remember laughing hysterically. The VHS tape went out of print in the early '80s and I spent more than 15 years looking for a copy. I finally found one and while not quite as funny as I remember, it is a funny movie that found an audience. George C. Scott is great as always. Barry Bostwick is great as the accountant who wants to be a songwriter. The songs should be comedy classics, especially, "It Just Shows to Go Ya."
I've seen a butchered version on TV once that cut out a bunch of the set-ups that are needed to make the jokes work. So if at all possible find a uncut version.
I've seen a butchered version on TV once that cut out a bunch of the set-ups that are needed to make the jokes work. So if at all possible find a uncut version.
This is a film-fan's film, filled with industry insight and in-jokes. (The two back-to-back stories, separated by a preview trailer, display the way the fictional (real?) studio's contract players would crank out product at a dizzying rate.) I wouldn't apply the words "parody" and "satire" in their strictest sense here, though....I'd rather say the sounds and images serve more to emphasize our real-or-imagined memories of the moviegoing experience in the mid-to-late Thirties. And the producers had the good sense to hire the great Ralph Burns and Buster Davis to write the terrific period songs and soundtracks (which deserve current re-release!). See it if only to catch the multi-talented Barry Bostwick, who gets a chance to shine in a singing-dancing role. And Charles Lane is always a treat to see. Everything's a treat in "Movie Movie"!
"Movie Movie" is an absolute gem that few people have even heard of. It's a throwback to the days of old when you went to the movies and stayed all day long. In this film we are treated to two short films (one in color, one in b&w) that sandwich an assortment of coming attractions and other goodies from a bygone era.
George C. Scott stars in both short films. One is a boxing movie and the other is a musical. This film is hard to find but does pop up occasionally on cable. I suggest looking for this at your local video store. It's a real gem for anyone who ever loved going to the movies then and now.
George C. Scott stars in both short films. One is a boxing movie and the other is a musical. This film is hard to find but does pop up occasionally on cable. I suggest looking for this at your local video store. It's a real gem for anyone who ever loved going to the movies then and now.
Just wrote a review of the far, far, far, far, inferior "National Lampoon's Movie Madness," which also parodies films, though contemporary ones. I brought up "Movie Movie" as an example of the same concept which is as excellent as the National Lampoon movie is awful.
This is a delightful trip back to the movies of the 1930's. Somehow I saw this movie when it first came out. I guess I sought it out as (having been an eager consumer of Mad Magazine as a little squirt) I am a fan of parodies and mockumentaries of this sort. I remember watching it in a tiny closet-sized movie theater in a shopping mall in New Jersey. I wouldn't be surprised if it was the only movie theater in the state of New Jersey that played it. I was only 12 years old at the time, and obviously not around during the 1930's, but I had been exposed to enough old movies on television during my young life that I enjoyed the whole thing fully.
I remember noticing that both movies start off with the same stock footage of a busy Manhattan street, the first one in black and white of course, and the second one in color, both backed by a similar jaunty tune meant to evoke the bustle of Manhattan in the 1930's. Sure to provoke a big laugh even before we meet the characters or hear the first line of dialog.
Who know George C. Scott had such a facility for comedy? It's worth finding out. If you are in any way, shape or form a fan of crusty old movies, you should seek this out. A lovable way to spend 100 minutes.
This is a delightful trip back to the movies of the 1930's. Somehow I saw this movie when it first came out. I guess I sought it out as (having been an eager consumer of Mad Magazine as a little squirt) I am a fan of parodies and mockumentaries of this sort. I remember watching it in a tiny closet-sized movie theater in a shopping mall in New Jersey. I wouldn't be surprised if it was the only movie theater in the state of New Jersey that played it. I was only 12 years old at the time, and obviously not around during the 1930's, but I had been exposed to enough old movies on television during my young life that I enjoyed the whole thing fully.
I remember noticing that both movies start off with the same stock footage of a busy Manhattan street, the first one in black and white of course, and the second one in color, both backed by a similar jaunty tune meant to evoke the bustle of Manhattan in the 1930's. Sure to provoke a big laugh even before we meet the characters or hear the first line of dialog.
Who know George C. Scott had such a facility for comedy? It's worth finding out. If you are in any way, shape or form a fan of crusty old movies, you should seek this out. A lovable way to spend 100 minutes.
- Scott_Mercer
- Nov 15, 2008
- Permalink
Stanley Donen in 1978 was old enough to remember how Warner Brothers double features of the 1930s played, and he brings them pretty gloriously back to life in this affectionate double-bill-within-a-single-movie, helped by a knowing, funny script by Larry Gelbart and Sheldon Keller. The first, a Kid Galahad-type boxing melo reveling in bad Clifford Odets-style metaphors, looks wonderful in black and white and is superbly cast, with, among others, George C. Scott in what might have been the Walter Huston role, Red Buttons doing Frank McHugh, Harry Hamlin as Wayne Morris, and a very funny Trish van Devere lampooning Eva Marie Saint in On the Waterfront. The 42nd Street parody rounding it out has some curiosities--it's in color, which it wouldn't have been in in 1933, the songs aren't all diegetic as they would have been, the camera work's a little more sophisticated than it should be--but gets most of it right, including Barry Bostwick and Rebecca York doing Dick Powell and Ruby Keeler and Barbara Harris doing a Joan Blondell. The in-between preview, Zero Hour--War at Its Best!--is a riot, with Scott, Buttons, and Eli Wallach parading around as some hilariously overage young World War I fliers. This didn't make much noise in 1978, and it's hard to know why--it's marvelously entertaining, the cast is aces, and plenty of people around then remembered the originals it so expertly spoofs.
I viewed this movie in Israel, where it was shown with subtiles. Whilst discusing the movie what stood out was how those who had relied only on the text viewed it as a serious presentation exactly as the style/era that it was spofing. Contrast this with native English speakers, who also were familiar with the era could detect the various sendups and would frequently burst out in peals of laughter. All in all I found it very well presented and acted, well worth viewing both for it's content and social comment.
"Movie Movie" is one of the finest examples of deadpan spoofery to ever hit the big screen. In the same vein as the iconically deader-than-deadpan Leslie Nielsen in "Airplane!" except predating it by 2 years, here we get a buffet of fine dramatic actors like George C. Scott ("Patton"), Eli Wallach ("The Good, the Bad & the Ugly"), Harry Hamlin ("Clash of the Titans") plus fantastic stage legends like Ann Reinking ("All That Jazz") and Barry Bostwick ("Rocky Horror") all pouring their talents into a riotously absurd script. They do it so straight-faced that you'll probably miss at least 25% of the hilarious lines, and that's why this is such a great flick for repeat viewings.
Honestly, I found myself watching the entire film with my remote in hand so I could rewind and catch all the sneaky zingers that slipped past while I was still laughing at the last one. This is the kind of movie that you can quote endlessly to your friends until you have no friends left.
Some choice lines include:
(door knocking) "Oh! That must be the door."
or "It's been my lifelong dream! For years."
or "Can I walk you home?" "Sure, New York's a free country." (that one took me a while)
Played totally straight with no rim shots, laugh tracks or often without even a comedic beat, these gags truly put the tongue so firmly in cheek that you'd think you're at the dentist. George C. Scott, fresh off his Academy Award for playing the stone-hearted General Patton, is surprisingly perfect in this deadpan role as you might've guessed from his performance in "Dr Strangelove" 15 years earlier. In fact, the humor here is very similar to that classic film with clever, absurd wordplays driving the entire show. So if you cracked a smile at Strangelove's "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room" then I guarantee you'll have plenty to keep you laughing during this flick.
The story. "Movie Movie" is essentially a mockup of a 1930s double feature, right down to the hilarious previews at intermission. The first segment is a black & white drama about a young New York boxer "Joey Popchik" (Harry Hamlin in his 1st film) who needs to make $20,000 real fast so his sister can afford eye surgery in Vienna---plus $5000 "for car fare". This segment is a surprisingly meticulous homage to the golden age of Hollywood, with first class cinematography and lighting that would put it on par with the best film noir masterpieces out there. Dialogue is similarly right in sync with the wisecracking lingo and accents of the time, and if you didn't know better you'd think you were watching a lost reel from "On the Waterfront" (by the way Marlon Brando's older sister Jocelyn plays the mother). If you're familiar with Hollywood's b&w classics, it helps to get you in on the jokes but it's not required. The witty dialogue is plenty enough to tickle your ribs right under your nose behind your back.
The 2nd "feature", starring the same actors often in nearly identical roles, is a lavish, colorful MGM type musical that would make Mel Brooks bust a gut. Again, there are no overt sight gags or ba-dum-ching zingers, but even funnier, it's pure straight-faced & straight-laced deadpan awesomeness. The opening scene with George C. Scott ("Spatz") talking to his doctor (played by Art Carney) had me in stitches.
DOCTOR: You have 6 months to live. SPATZ: 6 months from today? Well, that's not too b-- DOCTOR: 6 months from your last appointment, which was 5 months ago. SPATZ: So that's 1 month. Well at least I have 30 days-- DOCTOR: This is February.
Again, I can't stress enough how great the delivery is. I can't think of any other films that nail the tone & timing so well except for the aforementioned Leslie Nielsen in "Airplane!" and "Naked Gun" (Leslie himself being a serious dramatic actor who simply read his lines without any comedic twang). This is definitely an unusual type of comedy, if not the only one of its kind. But if you're a fan of this sort of humor, you absolutely must see it. My review can't do it justice. Or as Joey says in the movie: "It was the late great Gloves Malloy who said how hard it is to say what there are no words for."
Honestly, I found myself watching the entire film with my remote in hand so I could rewind and catch all the sneaky zingers that slipped past while I was still laughing at the last one. This is the kind of movie that you can quote endlessly to your friends until you have no friends left.
Some choice lines include:
(door knocking) "Oh! That must be the door."
or "It's been my lifelong dream! For years."
or "Can I walk you home?" "Sure, New York's a free country." (that one took me a while)
Played totally straight with no rim shots, laugh tracks or often without even a comedic beat, these gags truly put the tongue so firmly in cheek that you'd think you're at the dentist. George C. Scott, fresh off his Academy Award for playing the stone-hearted General Patton, is surprisingly perfect in this deadpan role as you might've guessed from his performance in "Dr Strangelove" 15 years earlier. In fact, the humor here is very similar to that classic film with clever, absurd wordplays driving the entire show. So if you cracked a smile at Strangelove's "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room" then I guarantee you'll have plenty to keep you laughing during this flick.
The story. "Movie Movie" is essentially a mockup of a 1930s double feature, right down to the hilarious previews at intermission. The first segment is a black & white drama about a young New York boxer "Joey Popchik" (Harry Hamlin in his 1st film) who needs to make $20,000 real fast so his sister can afford eye surgery in Vienna---plus $5000 "for car fare". This segment is a surprisingly meticulous homage to the golden age of Hollywood, with first class cinematography and lighting that would put it on par with the best film noir masterpieces out there. Dialogue is similarly right in sync with the wisecracking lingo and accents of the time, and if you didn't know better you'd think you were watching a lost reel from "On the Waterfront" (by the way Marlon Brando's older sister Jocelyn plays the mother). If you're familiar with Hollywood's b&w classics, it helps to get you in on the jokes but it's not required. The witty dialogue is plenty enough to tickle your ribs right under your nose behind your back.
The 2nd "feature", starring the same actors often in nearly identical roles, is a lavish, colorful MGM type musical that would make Mel Brooks bust a gut. Again, there are no overt sight gags or ba-dum-ching zingers, but even funnier, it's pure straight-faced & straight-laced deadpan awesomeness. The opening scene with George C. Scott ("Spatz") talking to his doctor (played by Art Carney) had me in stitches.
DOCTOR: You have 6 months to live. SPATZ: 6 months from today? Well, that's not too b-- DOCTOR: 6 months from your last appointment, which was 5 months ago. SPATZ: So that's 1 month. Well at least I have 30 days-- DOCTOR: This is February.
Again, I can't stress enough how great the delivery is. I can't think of any other films that nail the tone & timing so well except for the aforementioned Leslie Nielsen in "Airplane!" and "Naked Gun" (Leslie himself being a serious dramatic actor who simply read his lines without any comedic twang). This is definitely an unusual type of comedy, if not the only one of its kind. But if you're a fan of this sort of humor, you absolutely must see it. My review can't do it justice. Or as Joey says in the movie: "It was the late great Gloves Malloy who said how hard it is to say what there are no words for."
- mark.waltz
- Nov 4, 2012
- Permalink
Affectionate parody of 1930's movies with Scott hamming it up perfectly in double roles. There's a boxing drama, then a corny musical, but it adds up to fun in this pleasant trip down Hollywood's memory lane.
I loved this film and truly believe that most people will find the movie boring and trite. That's because I am a huge fan of the Golden Age of Hollywood and only lovers of these old movies would find this lovingly made film interesting. The movie is broken down into two wonderful parodies of Warner Brothers movies--specifically a musical similar to 42nd STREET and a boxing film similar to KID GALAHAD. These parodies, though, are meant more as a homage to the genres, as the movie really seems to try to honor the style instead of ridicule the originals. It was like the exact same writers and sensibilities were magically transported to 1978. George C. Scott did a great job--it's too bad this film is a one of a kind.
- planktonrules
- Feb 25, 2006
- Permalink
- writers_reign
- Dec 3, 2011
- Permalink
I know when I saw this film in'78 the first story was in black and white and then the second story in color. It's been showing on cable where it's color straight through. So for you purists out there, you should turn your color down on your TV when you watch the first story with Harry Hamlin if you want to see the film the way it was intended. This movie is a great time. Hilarious and clever!!!
...why I walked out on this "movie movie" before the first segment was even halfway over. What schlock! It was replayed on TV today and I managed to stumble on the final half of the first segment, and struggle through it and the first few minutes of the second one. Don't get me wrong. It's a great cast of actors, and I love Spoof, but this "movie" falls short of spoof and lands smack dab in the middle of schlock. Some writer/writers should have been turned away at the door and this script tossed into the garbage can. Oh sure, there are moments when the actors do a genuine good job of performing their roles, but it's demeaning to have to sit through all the "CR4%" waiting for a few seconds of said actor delivering a good take. I was 17 when I walked out of it the first time. Now I'm 62, and I'm surfing back to BUZZER for old game show reruns. 3-stars is too generous.
- max_baker-55418
- Jan 16, 2023
- Permalink