Straight-acting is a term for LGBT individuals who do not exhibit the typical appearance or mannerisms of what is seen as stereotypically gay. Although the label is used by and reserved almost exclusively for gay and bisexual men, it may also be used to describe lesbian or bisexual women exhibiting a typically feminine appearance and mannerisms.[1] Since the term invokes negative stereotypes of gay people, its application is often controversial and may cause offense.[2]
Proposed explanations and criticisms
editCommunication Scholar Shinsuke Eguchi proposed an explanation for the emergence of the straight acting phenomenon in 2009: "[S]ome gay men want to achieve hegemonic masculinity to overcome gay effeminate images".[3] Both Eguchi and Tim Berling relate it to the general context of sissyphobia—the dominant cultural norm that disparages effeminate men and is not restricted to the gay culture.[4] In "Negotiating Sissyphobia: A critical/ interpretive analysis of one ‘femme’ gay Asian body in the heteronormative world," Shinsuke Eguchi (2011) writes, "I began to see that the discursive manifestation of sissyphobia is not that feminine gay men are unattractive and undesirable. Rather, these straight-acting gay men would like to present their “heteronormative” masculine faces in their social interactions with others" (p. 50).[5]
Sex advice columnist Dan Savage commented on the popularity of the term "straight-acting" in gay personal ads, criticizing both the practice and the idea that a man seeking a gay relationship through a gay personal ad is acting straight.[6] Defenders of the term maintain it refers merely to one's mannerisms and that critics' isolation of the word "acting" in the phrase distorts the intended meaning of the phrase. Use of the term itself has been labeled as damaging to the LGBT community, as it associates certain attributes with homosexuality.[2]
Men who use the expression "straight-acting" may express resentment that critics claim the term implies they are acting and not being their true selves.[1]
QUASH
editQueers United Against Straight Acting Homosexuals (QUASH) was the organization in Chicago that published an often cited article in their newsletter in 1993,[7] titled "Assimilation is Killing Us Fight For a Queer United Front."[8] The article calls for a new order in our gendered social systems to be inclusive and not exclude anyone from liberation, challenging the power and privilege of the dominant members of society.[7] An article similar to "Assimilation is Killing Us", published a year later, entitled, QUASH, still standing for Queers United Against Straight-Acting Homosexuals, used the same concept of rejection of the established gendered protocols, specifically, that there can be varied and better institutions than couple hood and marriage.[9]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b Clarkson, Jay (1 January 2006). "'Everyday Joe' versus 'Pissy, Bitchy, Queens': Gay Masculinity on Straight Acting.com". The Journal of Men's Studies. 14 (2): 191–207. doi:10.3149/jms.1402.191. S2CID 143567101.
- ^ a b Acting Straight
- ^ Eguchi, Shinsuke (November 2009). "Negotiating Hegemonic Masculinity: The Rhetorical Strategy of 'Straight-Acting' among Gay Men". Journal of Intercultural Communication Research. 38 (3): 193–209. doi:10.1080/17475759.2009.508892. S2CID 143828086.
- ^ Bergling, Tim (2001). Sissyphobia: Gay Men and Effeminate Behavior. Southern Tier Editions. ISBN 978-1-56023-989-5.[page needed]
- ^ Eguchi, Shinsuke (1 January 2011). "Negotiating Sissyphobia: A Critical/Interpretive Analysis of One 'Femme' Gay Asian Body in the Heteronormative World". The Journal of Men's Studies. 19 (1): 37–56. doi:10.3149/jms.1901.37. S2CID 147257629.
- ^ "Sissies". This American Life. 13 December 1996.
- ^ a b Cohen, C. J. (1 January 1997). "Punks, Bulldaggers, and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics?". GLQ. 3 (4): 437–465. doi:10.1215/10642684-3-4-437.
- ^ Queers United Against Straight-Acting Homosexuals (1993). "Assimilation is Killing Us Fight For a Queer United Front". Why I hated the march on Washington. Quash. p. 4. OCLC 40181964.
- ^ Enszer, Julie R. (2013). "'Whatever Happens, This Is': Lesbians Engaging Marriage". Women's Studies Quarterly. 41 (3–4): 210–224. doi:10.1353/wsq.2013.0089. JSTOR 23611516. S2CID 84671077. ProQuest 1503682489.